| It is easier for me to imagine an infinite universe, than it | | | | amount of space. |
| is to imagine and infinite inner universe. Still, that does | | | | What if we consider all of the matter in the universe |
| not mean that there is a limit to inner space. It just | | | | as being converted to free energy? There would then |
| seems like more difficult a concept to imagine. There is | | | | be no limitation, would there? Could we then squeeze |
| also no guarantee that the universe is infinite as well. | | | | all of the matter in the universe into one tiny space? |
| There very well could be a boundary to the universe. If | | | | The big bang theory and the singularity comes to mind. |
| that is the case than one has to ask the question of | | | | The problem here is that inner space is infinite than |
| what is beyond that boundary. Perhaps the biggest | | | | theoretically all of the energy could implode on itself |
| and only true problem in science is the human minds | | | | indefinitely. So there must be a limit here as to how |
| inability to truly grasp the universe we live in. I, and | | | | much energy can occupy a given space. Its either that |
| indeed we all; keep trying though. So, is there a limit to | | | | or there is a limit to inner space. A boundary exists to |
| the inner universe. I hate touching this question, | | | | smallness. One has to assume this boundary exists if |
| because that requires delving into the world of | | | | you believe in the big bang, because there would have |
| quantum mechanics. One has to, it is a boundary that | | | | been no reason for the singularity to expand or |
| must be passed into the infinitely small. | | | | explode. This creates a stranger notion for me that |
| We all know that matter is composed of normal | | | | something with no mass can still have a limit to how |
| matter is composed of protons, neutrons, and | | | | much of it can occupy a given amount of space. |
| electrons. The only exception is hydrogen, no neutron | | | | Considering infinite largeness, using all of the matter in |
| is present in its nucleus. These particles make up | | | | the universe. If you could get all of the matter in the |
| atoms, that combine to form compounds. Beyond this | | | | universe together without it imploding under the weight |
| level is the field of quantum physics, the study of the | | | | of its own gravity, then what? There is a finite amount |
| very small. Quarks, Leptons, and Bosons are the | | | | of matter in the universe, so once we have our big ball |
| subatomic components to protons, neutrons, and | | | | of matter, what is beyond this? Again, the answer is |
| electrons. Beyond this, who knows. Perhaps sub | | | | empty space. A vacuum that goes on forever, and |
| atomic particles are made up of smaller particles or | | | | ever. The only real way to consider the question of an |
| sub-subatomic particles. Is there a never ending spiral | | | | infinite inner space is when you do not consider matter |
| into an infinite smallness? Probably not, at some point it | | | | or energy. Remove them from the equation and only |
| is reasonable to assume that we reach pure energy. | | | | consider the vacuum. It then becomes easier to |
| Perhaps energy can be rolled up to form a sub atomic | | | | imagine infinity going both ways. This imaginary |
| particle and those sub atomic particles make up | | | | universe does not exist though, the only one that does |
| particles, atoms, and so on. Perhaps the way energy | | | | (that we know off) is this one. One in which matter |
| forms a sub atomic particle determines the behavior | | | | and energy are everywhere. And in this universe there |
| of that particle. Hence there are six Flavors of Quarks, | | | | seems to be a boundary to the infinitely small, but not |
| six types of Leptons, and twelve types of Gauge | | | | the infinitely large. Then again, this could be a product |
| Bosons. | | | | of our daily lives. Matter is all around us, and we live on |
| Is the energy boundary the limit? Once you have pure | | | | a big ball of it. In the end it may be that we live in a |
| energy, it is easy to imagine something getting smaller | | | | matter zone. At this stage, the one we live on there |
| and smaller, because there is no solid component to | | | | are quantifiable sizes to things. Once you get beyond |
| the object. There is no object, only energy. In my minds | | | | matter into the farthest reaches of our universe there |
| eye I can imagine a journey into infinite smallness. At | | | | may exist a vast empty, infinite beyond. The same |
| the same time this notion seems out side the realm of | | | | may go for the inner verse. Once you get beyond the |
| possibility. However, the same thing can be done with | | | | boundary of matter and energy, there may be another |
| traveling into outer space. It seems so much easier to | | | | void. One that expands forever into the infinitely small. |
| imagine getting bigger and bigger vs smaller and | | | | At the end of the day this is nothing more than a fun |
| smaller. And yet the same process is used. I can | | | | exercise for me. I like to ponder these questions, but I |
| imagine space as infinite in either direction. Is this the | | | | do have certain conclusions that I believer more than |
| case? You don't need matter or energy for this | | | | others. Anyone that has read my paper on the Nothing |
| experiment. In fact, lets remove both and just consider | | | | Universe knows what I believe we will find if we go far |
| an empty void. Imagine the universe as containing no | | | | enough out into space. That hypothesis has the infinite |
| energy and no matter. Is this possible? It seems that | | | | beyond as being composed of an undiscovered, super |
| matter could be inherently linked to the concept of | | | | symmetrical atom composed of both matter and anti |
| space. If nothing existed then there would be no limit to | | | | matter. The combination of which forms the true |
| smallness because nothing would exist. After all, one | | | | essence of nothing. That hypothesis does not preclude |
| cannot have size when no object exists to consider. | | | | the existence of a infinite inner universe. All be it one |
| Size seems to be at the center of the notion of infinite | | | | that did not exist before the creation of the universe |
| space. When I try to conceive of an object getting | | | | as we know it. And yet, it is easy for me to envision |
| smaller and smaller or bigger and bigger I seem to | | | | space existing between the particles within the nothing |
| reach a limit. Even when you consider that an atom is | | | | universe. So, it may just be that the structure of the |
| mostly empty space. If you removed that empty | | | | nothing universe suffers from a limitation of scale. |
| space to the limit possible than an object cannot get | | | | Once that limitation is breached than an infinite inner |
| any smaller without shedding parts of itself. Is this what | | | | universe free of matter may still exist within the |
| happens with a black hole? Is there a limit to the | | | | Nothing Universe. If you are confused than I would |
| amount of mass that can occupy a given amount of | | | | suggest reading my article on a nothing universe. To |
| space? I assume that when an object implodes to | | | | go into it now would take way too long. For now I |
| form a black hole, matter is rearranged to allow for as | | | | have to conclude that there is a strong possibility that |
| little free space as possible between atoms; as well as | | | | there is no limit to inner space, and that it may be |
| within the atoms themselves. In this case there is a | | | | infinite after all. As much as I find that notion illogical, I |
| limitation to how much matter can exist in a given | | | | can't dismiss it. |